# Introducing Search Plus (BETA)

**URL:** <https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/t/introducing-search-plus-beta/76979>\
**Category:** Product Updates\
**Tags:** featured\
**Created:** [14 May 2026 12:18 UTC](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/t/introducing-search-plus-beta/76979 "2026-05-14T12:18:50Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Itchyfeet](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/8491ac/32.png) [@Itchyfeet](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/u/Itchyfeet)\
**Post date:** [20 May 2026 09:36 UTC](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/t/introducing-search-plus-beta/76979/61 "2026-05-20T09:36:02Z")

</div>

I have been reading about this new feature for days now. I have tried on my app but cannot access any of the searches that other people have described

Is it available to everyone on the app?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon52083843](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/a9adbd/32.png) [@anon52083843](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/u/anon52083843)\
**Post date:** [20 May 2026 09:44 UTC](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/t/introducing-search-plus-beta/76979/62 "2026-05-20T09:44:51Z")

</div>

Perhaps you need to manually update the THS app and then try again.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Itchyfeet](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/8491ac/32.png) [@Itchyfeet](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/u/Itchyfeet)\
**Post date:** [22 May 2026 17:43 UTC](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/t/introducing-search-plus-beta/76979/63 "2026-05-22T17:43:24Z")

</div>

Thanks, I now have access and tried it out. I think it has merits, especially searching for Europe without UK

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Brightlight](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/f0a364/32.png) [@Brightlight](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/u/Brightlight)\
**Post date:** [23 May 2026 06:04 UTC](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/t/introducing-search-plus-beta/76979/64 "2026-05-23T06:04:14Z")

</div>

@Itchyfeet did it work for you. I used their example button and the first 6 results were UK.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Itchyfeet](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/8491ac/32.png) [@Itchyfeet](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/u/Itchyfeet)\
**Post date:** [23 May 2026 14:02 UTC](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/t/introducing-search-plus-beta/76979/65 "2026-05-23T14:02:43Z")

</div>

Yes I have just tried it again, none from the UK in the list

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![co\_ri\_na](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.trustedhousesitters.com/co_ri_na/32/37033_2.png) [@co\_ri\_na](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/u/co_ri_na)\
**Post date:** [25 May 2026 13:30 UTC](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/t/introducing-search-plus-beta/76979/66 "2026-05-25T13:30:23Z")

</div>

![43800](https://europe1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/uploads/trustedhousesitters/original/3X/f/4/f4a66297efd269ea80abf59cb92917683406e634.jpeg)

Can you explain please why there’s a man pictured in search+ whilst the majority of sitters are women​⁉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MaggieUU](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.trustedhousesitters.com/maggieuu/32/48178_2.png) [@MaggieUU](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/u/MaggieUU)\
**Post date:** [25 May 2026 13:38 UTC](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/t/introducing-search-plus-beta/76979/67 "2026-05-25T13:38:12Z")

</div>

> [@co\_ri\_na](#):
>
> Can you explain please why there’s a man pictured in search+ whilst 90% of the sitters are women​ ⁉

Very unrealistic. Even more so because the man is consulting a map.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Twitcher](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.trustedhousesitters.com/twitcher/32/2011_2.png) [@Twitcher](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/u/Twitcher)\
**Post date:** [25 May 2026 13:49 UTC](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/t/introducing-search-plus-beta/76979/68 "2026-05-25T13:49:08Z")

</div>

How do you know the percentage of female sitters?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Brightlight](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/f0a364/32.png) [@Brightlight](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/u/Brightlight)\
**Post date:** [25 May 2026 18:04 UTC](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/t/introducing-search-plus-beta/76979/69 "2026-05-25T18:04:25Z")

</div>

Does anyone e know what the big NOT RELEVANT means on the search results? I thought it might be sits for times we are already booked but it’s not. The sits meet my search criteria and we’re free on the dates. There appears to be nothing else in the listings that would exclude us from applying. So I’m totally perplexed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Silversitters](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e480ec/32.png) [@Silversitters](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/u/Silversitters)\
**Post date:** [25 May 2026 20:05 UTC](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/t/introducing-search-plus-beta/76979/70 "2026-05-25T20:05:04Z")

</div>

I’ve not seen an explanation from THS .  
So this is just a guess -

I think that this can be used for feedback - tap “not relevant “ for each listing that doesn’t match the search criteria.

For example a search for sits in Europe excluding U.K. - that shows listings in U.K. tap on each U.K. listing because that is not relevant .

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![co\_ri\_na](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.trustedhousesitters.com/co_ri_na/32/37033_2.png) [@co\_ri\_na](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/u/co_ri_na)\
**Post date:** [25 May 2026 22:03 UTC](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/t/introducing-search-plus-beta/76979/71 "2026-05-25T22:03:54Z")

</div>

Because I can read

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Twitcher](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.trustedhousesitters.com/twitcher/32/2011_2.png) [@Twitcher](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/u/Twitcher)\
**Post date:** [26 May 2026 05:26 UTC](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/t/introducing-search-plus-beta/76979/72 "2026-05-26T05:26:35Z")

</div>

Thank you for your response.  
Did you read it on the THS site or elsewhere?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Brightlight](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/f0a364/32.png) [@Brightlight](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/u/Brightlight)\
**Post date:** [26 May 2026 05:27 UTC](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/t/introducing-search-plus-beta/76979/73 "2026-05-26T05:27:10Z")

</div>

Ahhh. Makes sense. Its not telling me. I should be telling it. Gotcha. Cheers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon52083843](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/a9adbd/32.png) [@anon52083843](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/u/anon52083843)\
**Post date:** [26 May 2026 05:51 UTC](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/t/introducing-search-plus-beta/76979/74 "2026-05-26T05:51:49Z")

</div>

I’ve not found any supporting evidence for 90% of members being female.

“While exact statistics are unavailable, insights from the community and the platform provide a clear picture:The Sitter Split: Active sitters on the platform are estimated to be roughly 80% women (including solo female sitters and female members of sitting couples).”

\*TrustedHousesitters does not publicly release an official demographic breakdown of men and women across their membership base".

If @co_ri_na has any verifiable evidence of the 90% claim please share it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Silversitters](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e480ec/32.png) [@Silversitters](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/u/Silversitters)\
**Post date:** [26 May 2026 07:08 UTC](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/t/introducing-search-plus-beta/76979/75 "2026-05-26T07:08:29Z")

</div>

I’ve not come across any gender split statistics published by THS . However , they did reveal this number in a times article earlier this year .

> [@Article in The Times](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/t/article-in-the-times/76186/1):
>
> The majority of our sitters are based in the US, with 65.3 per cent identifying as solo female travellers,” Laws says

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon52083843](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/a9adbd/32.png) [@anon52083843](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/u/anon52083843)\
**Post date:** [26 May 2026 07:16 UTC](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/t/introducing-search-plus-beta/76979/76 "2026-05-26T07:16:33Z")

</div>

But what we don’t know is how many mixed couples there are. I originally posted the clip from The Times, but forgot about it. Instinctively 90% females seems too high, but there may be supporting evidence.

I’d be interested in knowing the percentage of HOs with dogs only, cats only and dogs as well as cats.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![co\_ri\_na](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.trustedhousesitters.com/co_ri_na/32/37033_2.png) [@co\_ri\_na](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/u/co_ri_na)\
**Post date:** [27 May 2026 04:36 UTC](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/t/introducing-search-plus-beta/76979/77 "2026-05-27T04:36:31Z")

</div>

😂 Sorry for the confusion I didn’t realise people on here would take the 90% literally and make a big deal out of it  
My post was actually just a bit of light hearted banter about there being a male in the pic on a predominately used by women platform  
Unfortunately I can’t delete it but I’ve changed the original post to ‘the majority of’  
Hopefully that clears things up, my apologies for expecting a sense of humour  
My bad 🤷🏻‍♀️

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![co\_ri\_na](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.trustedhousesitters.com/co_ri_na/32/37033_2.png) [@co\_ri\_na](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/u/co_ri_na)\
**Post date:** [27 May 2026 04:44 UTC](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/t/introducing-search-plus-beta/76979/78 "2026-05-27T04:44:59Z")

</div>

Sorry for the confusion I didn’t realise people on here would take the 90% literally  
My post was actually just light hearted banter because of a man being pictured on a platform that’s predominantly used by women  
Unfortunately I can’t delete it but I’ve changed the original post to ‘the majority of’  
Hopefully that clears thing up  
Sorry for expecting a bit of a sense of humour on here  
My bad 🤷🏻‍♀️  
(still wondering why that number is relevant btw)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![co\_ri\_na](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.trustedhousesitters.com/co_ri_na/32/37033_2.png) [@co\_ri\_na](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/u/co_ri_na)\
**Post date:** [27 May 2026 04:46 UTC](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/t/introducing-search-plus-beta/76979/79 "2026-05-27T04:46:44Z")

</div>

Glad to see someone gets it 🙏🏻

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Twitcher](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.trustedhousesitters.com/twitcher/32/2011_2.png) [@Twitcher](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/u/Twitcher)\
**Post date:** [27 May 2026 08:17 UTC](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/t/introducing-search-plus-beta/76979/80 "2026-05-27T08:17:45Z")

</div>

> [@co\_ri\_na](#):
>
> Because I can read

My apologies, thought it was a fact.

[Previous page](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/t/introducing-search-plus-beta/76979.md?page=3)

[Next page](https://forum.trustedhousesitters.com/t/introducing-search-plus-beta/76979.md?page=5)
