@MerryPuppins I filled out the survey but must admit, I found one question quite disturbing. I am definitely not biased, I have gay family members, couldn’t care at all. But the way the question was worded I feel was out of line. Don’t think these terms were necessary. Different cultures, nationalities and orientation could find this wording quite out of place in today’s society. Not a question I think a pet/house-sitting business should be asking, regardless of the proposed direction they are looking to move to.
Totally geared towards solo travellers, lots of questions regarding safety etc. About 90% totally irrelevant to me, but you know any opportunities to get my point of view across. I get the push to make it inclusive, but again surely this is between the HO and the sitter.
Non-heterosexuals have money. Gearing traveling towards non-heterosexuals brings that money in. I am not saying that heterosexuals dont have money. Bur for example one of the latest Price marches I saw had a lot of travel specific commercials and a lot of common travel related companies were there with “fly with our pink wings”. I dont bother to search for numbers, but my vibe is that “gay travel” is a growing market, and this is why THS also asks, if they should gear towards that demographic or not. I would be annoyed by that question, but there is marketing and market share reasons behind it.
I also completed the survey but much of it was not relevant to me. No opportunity to actually make comments which was a shame.
@temba yes it was like give a generic response to their questions or none.
I haven’t seen the questions, but that would make sense.
Looking at the email in @Maggie8K’s post it was an environment and social impact survey targeting solo travellers and trying to understand what they feel (if anything) restricts their travel.
@Maggie8K I did, although I rarely travel solo (but just did an international solo sit so figured I qualified.) If I had to guess, we’ll be seeing a new advertising campaign for solo sitters based around sits solving the safety and loneliness aspectsof solo travel.
Thanks for all the helpful advice… yes, of course, those famous digital nomads. We had some staying when we used to run a B&B.
As hosts, I don’t think we’d necessarily be averse to have split sitters.
When people come to our house we will always have a friend operating as a local contact who can bridge any gaps and check the house in between sitters: as well as orientate them.
But as for sitting ourselves, we will probably focus on the shorter stints.
Thanks for all your help.
I do think it was geared toward supporting solo travelers of different types & backgrounds, including helping them feel safe traveling as well as addressing trends & needs for future marketing — but I totally get how it could make some uncomfortable to be asked out of context.
