Thank you for sharing your opinion on this platform.
I think the majority of the community would agree with your point of view.
You use the term ‘backfire’. I assume you mean that a sitter might not be chosen if they post a respectful clarification about a negative part of a review.
That may indeed happen.
And sometimes that is actually a good thing. The goal is to find a good match. You don’t want a situation where one party feels they have to walk on eggshells.
The reason I mentioned that reviews are also informative for pet sitters is that the OP only asked what hosts would think.
I simply wanted to point out that reviews serve both hosts and sitters. The goal is not to receive a ‘yes’ every time you apply. Sometimes not matching is the better outcome.
As for time: there are plenty of wonderful sits and great matches, especially if you’re willing to look beyond the beaten track and consider sits with fewer applications.
There is probably a reason why the platform allows people to add a clarification after a review.
Fortunately, everyone has free will and it is entirely up to the OP what they choose to do.
As for me, I honestly don’t know what I would do. I am a different person.
I think in this situation I would write a respectful review, mention the incident upfront if it is relevant, and also explain how we, as host and sitter, worked together to resolve it. I think that gives the most balanced picture and up till know- we have also done house swapping before doing TH - it works best for us.
We always have great matches, making new friends all over the world, no walking on eggshells or ignoring that incidents has happened. And if people don’t choose us, sometimes because other people reacted first or maybe other reasons, i just wish them both a great time.