I understand your point and how THS may be thinking. However, there’s a flaw in their logic.
It’s not surprising that a small number of full-time sitters have more sits than other sitters.
The flaw is in assuming that because they have more sits those sitters are keeping other sitters from getting sits. It’s not based on seniority or paying more. It’s basic competition and presenting yourself in the best manner to the HOs.
In other words, it’s been a level playing field.
The new system of first-to-apply and no more than 5 only favors the fastest to apply.
I challenge Ben or anyone to explain how that benefits new sitters or sitters who do not do as many sits as others.