Two sides to every story and this is mine. After communicating with the HO by email I almost cancelled. Two reasons why I didn’t. One, I had already booked the ferry and two, if i had cancelled the HO would have had difficulty finding replacements.
I did not have a good feeling about this sit and as it turns out, I was proved correct. In our initial contact by email the HO said that we were not really what they wanted as a sitter as they would have preferred a single person who would not have cost too much on the utility bills. This I found off putting. The HO explained the wood situation and said that they would leave enough wood for the duration of our stay. The wood only lasted until the end of February. We were then reduced to keeping, as far as possible to the small TV room with a fan heater to try to keep warm in a cold wet spring, only using the air conditioning when we were in the main kitchen and dining area, trying to keep the costs down.
All the reviews we have had in the many sits we have completed have been five star ones. The HO gave us three stars for organised. Can’t understand that one. Three stars for reliable. We managed everything required, and more without depending on any other outside help. The only thing we did was to leave a few hours early, leaving the cats with plenty of food and water. Self-sufficient, three stars. Why? When the washing machine door broke, I organised an engineer to come out and repair the door at a cost to me of 50 Euros. When the door lock broke, instead of calling out a locksmith at a cost of 150 Euros, I took the lock apart, bought a new barrel and repaired the lock at a cost to me of 15 Euros. I also changed a gas cylinder, another 34 Euros. I would suggest that that looks pretty self sufficient. No offer of reimbursement for my expenditure. The HO said that I had not been in touch enough.Through Whatsapp. I sent photographs and information twenty three times. how much more did they want? Clean and tidy. three stars. We left the house at least as clean and tidy as when we arrived if not more so. It was nice at least to get five stars for looking after the two cats. It was a joy and pleasure to do so and they made up for the other problems.
I think what upset the HO the most was our leaving early. Two reasons for leaving a few hours early. One we really wanted to meet our Portuguese friends and this was our only opportunity. The cats were left with plenty of food and water and I am sure that the HO has left them on occasions for a few hours. Two, we did not really want to meet the HO again as after our experiences, there would almost certainly have been an argument which I preferred to avoid. In all the years we have been members of Trusted Houssitters, our worst sit by a long way. One I would not like to repeat.
Also I do feel that when it comes to costs and seeing that the HO can ask for a contribution towards costs but the sitters cannot, this is very slanted in favour of the HO. This sit in Portugal cost over £2000 for fuel, ferries, and hotels en route which I willingly spent. Why then should the HO be able to ask for a contribution towards costs?
Edited to fix formatting.