Dont know if im getting the right message here?

I see there are many topics happening here. Im a bit confused. I thought your pet is the judge of good character. Surely if you meet a sitter 1st zoom etc the owner then makes the commitment for their pet am I right?

Unless the pet has super advanced communication skills, then yes. Its usually agreed by humans on both sides

14 Likes

Morning yes pets are very intelligent. Maybe thats its then super power owners. I mean the 5 rule. But who wants to vet more more more?

Not sure where this thread is going but I would say it is important for both pet sitters and homeowners to ‘vet’ each other. If it takes more than five applications then that is what it will take. It needs to be a good match for all concerned, humans and pets.

9 Likes

Its a big step for a HO, so understandable they want to feel 100% confident they have picked the correct person. They are letting a complete stranger into their house to look after their pet.

3 Likes

Yes halt when i read some thread’s all the different situations and opinions makes me feel well ??? HO living more rural takentheir time. Where as more city people seem quite sharp in their decisions. Am i right? Thats how it is for me anyways. I think it would be simply crazy as you really must love pets completely an have patience too tc

I’m not sure what point you are trying to make. Are you a sitter or a HO? What’s the issue?

1 Like

If what you’re getting at is that in this system, the in person meetings usually only occur AFTER the sit has been agreed on, then yes that is the case.

This can be hard for both experienced pet parents and professional or semi-pro sitters to grasp since a “meet and greet” is usually a must in paid sitting situations.

I often see THS sitters in person before the sit when they come to pick up the keys the day I’m leaving or before. Mostly my cat Walter will greet them while the other guys hide. The one time a sitter seemed uninterested in Walter, they wound up cancelling and despite its being last minute, I felt like I dodged a bullet.

Because humans are doing the vetting, it’s super important that the pet parents do some work on this and don’t automatically “trust” sitters just because they are members of trusted housesitters. This is why references and reviews are super important as are application letters and how sitters present themselves on video chats.

This is Walter:

7 Likes

Precisely i started a thread and the point is different opinions different feelings. Yes thats the point no issues ok dont you think its interesting how many directions this threads goes off on? Right im a sitter. All the vetting is done by TH already. Maybe just try intuition maybe when trusting someone with your home an pets maybe???

Evening Marion sorry you had been let down. Seems crazy to apply then cancel. You really need to love pets an animals to start with to join. What a creative photo thanks tc

1 Like

EDITING THIS SLIGHTLY FOR CLARITY AS I THINK IT WAS MISUNDERSTOOD:

Gotta disagree with that. I sit as well as host. Beyond an identity check for sitters and superficial background check in the US, TH does not vet sitters. When petparents join, as I remember I think THS also requires Petparents to submit a photo id, and allegedly a human looks at photos of the house submitted on a listing and the pet parent’s listingg before it goes live the first time, but that’s it. Sitters and petparents aren’t actually vetted in any meaninful way. This is matching site, and for safety’s sake, we’ve all got to properly vet each other.

I’m sorry, that is not a cat, it is a gray tiger prawn. :shrimp::shrimp::shrimp:

5 Likes

I don’t think you can say country people are slow to respond and city people are fast, it’s more about their personalities and general style of comms. What does come up a lot and is worth noting is that good comms is EVERYTHING alongside trusting your intuition. From the outset @Sharonshepherd1 - if both sides are not clear, friendly, prompt and open then it’s not a sit for us or many others. If it feels “off” for any reason at all then simply don’t do it. #trustyourgut

6 Likes

How cute is this little guy :heart::heart_eyes_cat::heart: cuteness overload

1 Like

Oh my word yes the US yes Im in the UK. Of course if both parties agree to further ID checks fine. For me i like the way the actual stay is tracked. I dont know are paid sitters under this type of scrutiny??? Ok tc

Oh well maybe someday someone may have monkeys to sit not just tiger prawns

Arr thanks cutterfish. I see we all have different experiences valuable to know. Whats comms please sorry bout my ignorance ok yeah i like the ignorance thing. Maybe TH do they put a time limit on making decisions??? Also you wait means then you cancel others you see ok tc

Comms stands for communication. No, there is no time limit on responding to sits or applications but good ones go fast and if you don’t respond quickly as an HO (home owner) then you will lose good sitters. 48/72 hours is considered polite. Once you have confirmed one sit then yes, you should quickly cancel your other applications to sits to free them up. Hope that helps @Sharonshepherd1

That is absolutely incorrect. THS does not do any vetting whatsoever. It can verify ID, etc., but members do the vetting themselves.

4 Likes

I’m in the UK and from our experience those living more rural areas DO NOT take their time at all, as we get given the go-ahead very quickly.

Maybe you just aren’t the right fit for the rural sits that you are applying for, whereas maybe you are the perfect fit for the ones in cities if you feel they are quick to decide.

Just a thought, but maybe ask yourself how many sits have you completed? How many sits have you been accepted for? How many sits have you applied for? Then see if there’s a pattern as to why you think that way, because you could save yourself time by going for the sits you are most likely to be accepted for, which is perhaps City ones.

3 Likes