Thank you so much for tips and link @Silversitters
I strongly question the legality of that provision and section - it would pose significant challenges for a company to operate with such terms in Scandinavia, where THS also conducts business.
The clause is vague, offering no clarity on potential reimbursement limits either.
It could lead to various scenarios where a caregiver is left unknowingly responsible for a sick pet’s expenses.
Unpaid reimbursement would likely require a lawyer and legal intervention, given that it becomes a private matter once funds are exchanged between parties, so it’s legally untenable for THS to incorporate such terms into their agreements.