Interviewing multiple candidates

Yes, that’s true. But for me the house itself is probably at the bottom of my list of priorities.

  • Pets come first, that means at the very top of the list and first in the sense if they are not pets I think I can confidently take care of and enjoy their company I just don’t continue reading.
  • At the same level of importance is how comfortable I feel with the hosts if they’re nice people who have reasonable expectations and are willing to communicate in a fluent, friendly and honest way.
  • The house itself is not important for me, I don’t need the same level of comfort as I have in my own house but I need a clean livable environment and I am not interested in high maintenance properties.

Anyway , I think you probably meant that too. I just wanted to develop a bit more what part of the

is important for me. Just getting the concept of mutual exchange is a great start.

2 Likes

Ok that’s fair. It’s good for both parties.

I always do a video chat. It’s important for me to meet the people I will be partnering with. The hosts make or break the sit. An otherwise wonderful sit can be very unpleasant with difficult hosts. These are the people I will be communicating with on a daily basis sending photos/updates. More importantly these are the people I will be dealing with if something goes wrong - a problem with the house, a sick pet. I want to have a sense of who they are before I agree to a sit. The video chat is also the time to get additional information and clarification on sit requirements. I always ask about the health of the pet, I’ve had a couple calls where health issues were brought up when I asked in the call that were not in the listing. I find video chats to be very important and I have declined sits a few times after a video chat when dealbreaker info was disclosed in the call or when I just didn’t feel the hosts and I were a good fit.

3 Likes

Same here re: tone of HO.
A few examples where the video call was helpful – sitter’s bed turned out to to be the child’s single bed. No thanks. He did acknowledge other sitters had said the same.
– A high-strung HO who got right in the camera and said “I need you to understand that you will need to be on alert 24/7 for any change in pet’s behavior and to get to the vet ER immediately.”
– I now prefer to “meet”/see both HOs if it’s a couple. I got “the PR rep” in one case…but it was the other person in the couple who writes the reviews.
–Having a longer than needed video call where HO is rambling and reveals some information that might make the sit difficult for the sitter.

5 Likes

@Newpetlover yes I did, well developed, thanks!

I have to say, that while my spouse now sits in on more interviews than he used to, with his schedule, if a sitter insisted on his presence, I’d probably move on as I don’t see the relevance and he has now returned to the office from previous remote so scheduling would be a nightmare.

2 Likes

You’re the one who handles the communication etc. though (or so it seems). Mostly I’m thinking about one particular sit.

1 Like