Hello! Hope this post finds all reading it in good health and high spirits. We are writing this from our twenty-second pet/house sit, and wish that those either sitting or connecting with sitters is enjoying the experience.
It would be interesting to accumulated a general consensus on how the sitting community, especially sitters, feel about pet and home owners solely having the ability to unconfirm a sit, effectively cancelling an assignment, yet sitters do not have this same ability.
Our primary motivation for seeking this change on Trusted Housesitters has arisen due to a circumstance we have been faced with.
A pet owner invited us to her home for a one month sit, which commences at the end of next week. Despite the travel involved, flight from our location and a subsequent train journey to their location, and the assignment being a last minute offer, we decided to accept.
However, we woke this morning to a message from the pet parent explicitly stating that we do not arrange travel, as her adult children have not yet decided their plans, and may wish to stay for that time.
We are in a compromised position. We have committed to a pet sit for one month, we have been ordered not to plan travel, which is filling fast. The pet owner has not committed to us fully, but has not explicitly cancelled the arrangement either.
We cannot apply for any other sits to cover that time due to the Trusted Housesitters cut-off policy and Trusted Housesitters support cannot unconfirm the pet sit as the pet owner has not explicity ordered its cancellation.
It is our belief that sitters should have the same capacity to unconfirm pet sits, as they are the ones organising and covering the cost of travel, just as pet and home owners can unconfirm sits as they feel fit.