We have been HO needing sitters for our house, garden, pets, and we have been sitters taking care of homes, gardens, pets.
With literally dozens of experiences (mostly as sitters since we retired!) it seems most people on both sides of the equation understand THS is a win-win-win equation.
HO, Sitters, Pets are all better off!
BUT since this Community Forum was launched, I have read too many commentaries that suggest the balance isn’t obvious to all.
Start with this:
The Homeowner needs security & peace of mind for their home and pets, expecting a reliable person who will be communicative & considerate.
The Sitter also needs a communicative & considerate HO who will make them feel welcomed & their stay pleasant.
Where has it gone off the rails most often?
IMHO when either side thinks that the other side is somehow benefitting more than they, or taking advantage of them.
Well, few things in life are a perfect balance - but within reason…
Our first experience as HO needing sitters was for a 25 day trip abroad.
Friends recommended sitters to us: the alternative? Having a someone we know stop by the house half a dozen times to make sure all was OK while our pets were in kennels at a cost of over USD$2,000 (this was a while ago: I suspect that cost is up 50% now.)
Not ideal by anyone’s measure.
Having sitters meant not inconveniencing a relative with keeping an eye on our house, and not stressing our pets with kenneling - not to mention the cost!
BONUS? Sitters would know immediately if a pipe burst or a fire threatened or a street flooded, etc. And break-ins would be less likely.
Our first sitters weren’t ideal, but our pets were clearly well taken care of and no emergencies happened to the house. They asked to stay a day early & two days after our return (four weeks at our place).
We had a big house and were fine with that.
Win-win-win.
Now that we’ve done both sides, here are some suggestions:
Communication is critical. As HO or Sitter be clear & honest about what you expect and will provide.
As a Home Owner:
Are you providing a good place for the Sitter? Room for their things? A comfortable bed? Decent WC? Have you cleaned it as you should for any visitor? Have you been clear about how easy/hard it is to spend time away from the home?
Have you been thorough in your description of what care your home, garden, pet(s) need? Have you made sure that there is enough pet food, things for your guest in the kitchen & bathroom? Good contacts for emergencies?
Remember: their presence means your home is safe, your pet(s) & plants cared for saving you both worry & money.
As a Sitter:
Have you made the HO secure that you’re able to arrive when they need you to be there? That you know how to care for the type of pet(s) they have? That you will be communicative so they know all’s well back home?
Remember: they are trusting you with their home and pets and saving you the expense of a place to stay - possibly the adventure of a new experience!
In short: no one is THE winner if ALL sides aren’t benefitting.
We love the people we’ve met through this system, the great peace of mind it gave us as HO and as sitters the fun of exploring places we might not have gone to if it weren’t for a Sit luring us there.
On the other hand: we have been there to take care of sick animals, plumbing near-disasters, and a few very unexpected events!
I’ve written this because I think it is such a shame to learn of either HO or Sitter situations that went sour from inconsiderate behaviour.
Happily for us, 97.5% of our experiences on both sides have been great!
So cheers to all those who “get” the win-win-win equation!