Where is homeowner accountability when a sit is materially misrepresented?

After 50+ sits, this was my worst experience

After completing more than 50 sits, I have just completed what was, by far, the most difficult sit I have ever experienced.
I am keeping this anonymous and will not identify the homeowner, pets, area, or property. I have reported the matter through the appropriate channel and have extensive documentation. I am posting here because I believe sitters should be able to discuss what happens when a sit is materially different from what was represented, and because I think the level of emergency accommodation support needs to be realistic for the area where a sitter is located.

I am not expecting a perfect home. I understand that homes are lived in, pets can have unexpected needs, and things can go wrong during any sit. However, this was not one isolated issue. It was an ongoing accumulation of undisclosed care requirements, health concerns, safety concerns, sanitation problems, pests, disrupted sleep, lack of privacy, difficult communication, and an abrupt end to the sit.

Here is what I encountered.
Before and upon arrival

• There was confusion about my confirmed arrival date, despite the date having been confirmed in advance.
• I did not receive a completed welcome guide before the sit. I received only a few handwritten pages of instructions after arriving.
• Important pet-care requirements were not disclosed in advance. I learned after arrival that feeding involved a more complicated routine, including raw food, food preparation, cooking eggs, and brushing the dog’s teeth.
• Instructions about handling raw food were unclear and changed during the sit. I raised food-safety concerns, was initially given one instruction, and later was told to cook the pet food everyday.
• I was not told before arriving that there was an existing mouse problem.
• I was not told before arriving about significant sanitation, pest, sleeping, or fire-safety concerns.
Pet health and care
• The dog’s actual age, condition, deafness and blindness, and care needs were substantially greater than I understood from the listing and pre-sit communication.
• I learned only after arriving about recent health issues affecting the dog, including a recent parasite issue and a heart-related diagnosis.
• The dog’s poor physical condition, and medical circumstances made the care much more demanding than anticipated.
• Emergency contacts were not reachable when the dog had a serious medical episode.
• A family member eventually came and took the dog to a safer and more manageable environment. That person was kind, understanding, and helpful.
Sleeping conditions
• I found mold on the guest bed on my first night.
• I did not want to wake the homeowner in the middle of the night, so I slept on a very hard and uncomfortable couch and got virtually no sleep.
• The mattress was later moved to a small office, where I slept on the floor for the rest of the sit.
• There was no proper space for my clothing or belongings, so my luggage had to be piled around the mattress. There was very little room to move around the office.
• The initial response to the fact that I had been unable to sleep felt dismissive rather than compassionate.
Safety and sanitation
• There was mold inside the refrigerator, including on interior refrigerator surfaces and on items, food, and containers stored inside.
• At the beginning of the sit, there were no functioning smoke detectors.
• After I raised the lack of smoke detectors, a handyman brought over a couple of detectors after several days.
• Based on the home’s layout and local requirements for smoke detectors outside bedrooms, there appeared to be a need for at least four working detectors.
• I encountered dirty pet dishes, dried pet waste, a dirty frying pan, a greasy stovetop, clutter, spider webs, and numerous other cleaning and maintenance concerns that were not part of my agreed responsibilities.
• There was not enough usable refrigerator space for the modest amount of food I brought for myself.
• I asked for perishables to be discarded before the homeowner left, but some were left behind for me to handle. I later had to dispose of spoiled or moldy food and other items.
Pests and rodent issue
• I was shown mouse droppings after I arrived and was told to clean them up.
• Later, mouse traps were delivered for me to use. I was uncomfortable being expected to manage and capture mice as part of a sit when the issue had not been disclosed in advance.
• There was an existing moth infestation that required me to take precautions to protect my own food and clothing.
• I encountered an ant problem in the kitchen after the homeowner left. The ants were being attracted to a jar of honey that had been left with the lid slightly open. When I reported it, I was told to clean it up.
• There was a major mosquito problem caused by stagnant water in outdoor fountains, including visible mosquito larvae. I was bitten repeatedly.
• I found a venomous spider on a cushion where the dog regularly sheltered. There were also extensive spider webs around the trash and recycling area.
House and maintenance problems
• I was notified in the middle of the night about a significant water leak.
• The city confirmed that there was a leak, and I spent approximately half a day trying to investigate and address it.
• The master bedroom and bathroom were locked and inaccessible to me.
• Another person later determined that the leak was coming from the inaccessible master bathroom.
• I was expected to deal with multiple pre-existing maintenance or household issues during the sit rather than simply provide the pet and home care I had agreed to provide.
Privacy and work disruption
• Multiple third parties arrived at the property without advance notice during the sit.
• This included a handyman and another person I had not met who came to wash vehicles.
• These arrivals occurred while I was working and participating in phone calls and meetings.
• The unannounced visits disrupted my work and made me feel that I had little privacy in the home.
Neighborhood conditions
• A neighboring property had frequent engine revving and vehicle-related activity only a few feet from the home.
• Exhaust fumes entered the house.
• When I approached the neighbor about the noise and fumes, he initially believed I was related to the homeowner. He yelled at me and told me to get off his property.
• After I explained that I was the pet sitter, he calmed down and told me there was an ongoing conflict with the homeowner.
• On another occasion, I returned from walking the dog and saw enough smoke around the house that I initially thought there might be a fire.
• I learned that an adjacent property was using a smoker located only feet from the home. It was used without notice, and the smoke entered and filled the house.
• There was also substantial construction behind the home, including a large work crew, hammering, heavy noise, paving-related odors, and a strong tar smell.
• I do not know whether the homeowner knew about the construction in advance. Regardless, it made the backyard difficult to use and further affected my ability to work and live comfortably during the sit.
Communication and early return
• I experienced the homeowner’s communication as dismissive, controlling, and at times patronizing.
• When I raised concerns, I felt that they were minimized rather than addressed.
• I was repeatedly told that I was a guest in the home and should be enjoying the homeowner’s “wonderful home.”
• I was encouraged to provide “glowing comments” rather than negative feedback while the homeowner was away.
• The confirmed return date was changed abruptly.
• One afternoon, I learned that the homeowner was already back in the United States and would arrive at the home later that same day.
• I had roughly two hours’ notice to pack, dispose of food I had bought for the remaining day, find alternative accommodation, leave the home, and rearrange important work commitments.

Why I did not leave earlier
I understand that people may ask why I did not leave as soon as the problems became clear. I could technically have ended the sit, and TrustedHousesitters indicated it could provide $150 toward emergency hotel accommodation.
However, $150 would not have covered even a basic hotel in the area. I would have had to pay a substantial amount out of pocket, likely for a poor-quality room without a kitchen or appropriate workspace.

I needed to remain in the area for important projects I had planned. A hotel would not have provided the kitchen access, workspace, privacy, or practical stability I needed. I was already trying to manage a difficult and increasingly stressful situation, and I did not believe that the available emergency assistance made leaving financially or practically realistic.

I appreciate that any contribution toward emergency accommodation may help in some situations. But in a high-cost area, $150 is not enough to make leaving a materially unsuitable sit a viable option for a sitter who is away from home, needs access to a kitchen, has work commitments, and cannot absorb substantial unplanned hotel costs.

Only Positives
The cat was the best part of the sit: friendly, social, affectionate, and a genuine pleasure to care for.
The family member who eventually took the dog was kind, helpful, and understanding. The handyman who brought the smoke detectors was also friendly and helpful.

Closing

I am sharing this as a complaint about a sit that, in my experience, was materially different from what was disclosed before I arrived. It involved a level of pet care, safety concerns, sanitation issues, pest problems, work disruption, and lack of practical support that I had not encountered in more than 50 prior sits.

You must be so relieved to have this one behind you. Glad to know the cat was such good company and you had two people who were able to improve your situation.
They were lucky to have such an experienced and flexible housesitter.
I wonder how you will tackle the review and stars category.
Maybe leave some time to decompress.
Thank you for sharing all this detail it helps both Home Owners and Housesitters in their own scenarios and preparations.
I have had some unpleasant surprises and treatments but this example is shocking.
I’m just glad you had 50 enjoyable sits to take this one more in your stride. Hats off to you!
Moving forward I hope you achieve the recognition and redress you seek.

I didn’t say that I had 50 enjoyable sits. I have had my fair share of issues that have come up during other sits but nothing to this extent.:flushed_face:

I am sorry to hear you had such a poor experience.

If by accountability you mean the host having to provide some sort of redress directly to the sitter, I don’t really think you can expect much there.

Being strictly a matching site at its core, I don’t think THS is in any position to dictate any sort of rules around that, such as providing the sitter with money for alternative accommodation for example.

Also, given that sitters are not any sort of employee or contractor of the site directly, their responsibility towards us is pretty limited as well–that they are simply providing a platform to connect people rather than directly offering the servic, is a very important distinction as far as what they’re required to do or what they may be responsible for from a legal aspect for example.

If the sitter encounters a problem with the sit and they can no longer stay there, the site is under no obligation to arrange for alternative accommodation.

It just sounds like you had a really unfortunate experience, and like you said, there were a number of reasons why leaving did not seem feasible, so you felt like you had no other choice but to stick it out.

Really the best thing you can do is just report the listing, and from what it sounds like, they don’t seem like they should be allowed here, and perhaps their account will be removed. I know that does nothing to help your situation that already happened, but again, I don’t really think there’s much else that can be done. The site can’t really control who signs up on either end, and they can’t control whether sitters and hosts are honestly representing themselves. It is unfortunate you encountered someone who was so blatantly dishonest but I do think people like that are rare.

I am sure as someone who has done that many sits, you have seen firsthand that situations like this are pretty rare. I have done over 130 sits on here and never have come remotely close to encountering an experience like this. But there is always risk a sit can turn out very different than expected and we have to accept that.

Again, sorry this happened and I hope that you do report them and THS takes the appropriate action.

I would suggest that sitters avoid any sits where they can’t afford or otherwise have a Plan B. If premium coverage wouldn’t be enough and you can’t cover the gap (or go home or find another sit), for instance, then you’re effectively trapped in whatever crappy sit you encounter. Better to avoid such risks to begin with, by not accepting such sits.

Even if THS booted the host from its platform after the fact and no matter what review you write, that wouldn’t help solve your immediate problem.

As a matching platform, THS doesn’t take responsibility for the quality of sits. That means sitters and hosts have to provide self-care.

@KellyK, congrats on 50+ completed housesits. Yikes to hear of recent experience. Please raise a Member Dispute (process & information below). THS staff collate allegations, evidence and determine next steps. We’d like to think that THS would permanently bar noted pet parent from THS platform. We have raised one Member Dispute (dog bites) and pet parent was barred. That frankly didn’t make up for the terrible experience but at least stopped other housesitters from a similar fate.

Keep smiling :grinning_face:

https://support.trustedhousesitters.com/hc/en-gb/articles/360001894038-Complaints-and-Member-Disputes

To be clear, this was fraud. And THS should do more to prevent this.

Dear THS suggestion box ideas :slight_smile:

  1. You must post photos that are reflective of the home the sitter will be staying in. Real estate photos are not permitted.
  2. All noise, construction work for example, noisy neighbours must be disclosed.
  3. The home must be free of major sanitation issues: pests, rodents, mould or any other related issue which may affect the health and comfort of the sitter.

Should the above not be observed, THS shall retain the right to charge your card on file for the sitter’s replacement accommodations and travel costs should the home or pets not be as represented on arrival and or pose a serious threat to the security, health or safety of the sitter.

That will stop these kinds of issues in their tracks. People do what they do because they can get away with it. THS should not let them or pay for when a sitter is a victim of fraud.

Yep @Love pets is right, feels like fraud to me too.

You had me at mice, that would have been enough for me I would be out. Cockroaches, spiders, snakes, meh, but mice I’m on the table screaming and certainly never sleeping. I can not believe the conditions some people live in.

So sorry for what you went through. I hope it wasn’t a long sit.

Just curious, what were the reviews like of prior sitters? It’s horrible to think that prior sitters overlooked such conditions and simply gave 5* s or not provide a review. Failure to be honest can cause others to have horrible experiences.

You should note the name of the previous sitters so you know not to trust their reviews if they were a sitter at the next house you’re interested in. Well, that’s if you even continuing with THS.

Sounds hideous and can’t believe you stayed! On a side note the $150 is per night up to $1500 so it would have been a lot more significant if you’d gone down that route. Duff info sadly from THS support. The $150 figure is the max per night for accommodation that the premium covers and the max no of night in total you can claim for is 30. Sorry that info is too late. #whatanightmare

This is the best advert for graduating to Premium membership! It’s very tough when you feel short changed by THS and the “fraudulent” Home Owners.
Your attention to detail is remarkable and I hope you took photos. This experience needs to become a once in a pet sitter’s lifetime!
Pity the lovely cat wasn’t a mouser!

Sorry to hear about this situation.

As you’ve highlighted, the THS cancellation plan provides limited coverage. It can be useful as a safety net, but mainly in areas where alternative accommodation is available for under $150 per night. Sitters on a limited budget often avoid expensive areas for precisely this reason.

I don’t know how long the sit was or how many alternatives were available locally, but one option could have been to give notice that you needed to leave, ask THS to amend the end date, and look for another sit covering the remaining dates.

I faced something similar when a host had a serious accident while on holiday and had to return home just a few days into a three-week sit. The sit itself had been perfectly fine, but their circumstances meant I had to leave early and make alternative arrangements. It was difficult, but completely understandable given the situation.

Ultimately, unexpected circumstances can happen to either host or sitter, so having some flexibility and a contingency plan is important.

Thank you for raising a member dispute to THS to highlight the issues . Please report back on the outcome of the member dispute you have raised . As sitters we would hope that hosts who treat sitters like this are removed from the platform by THS.

How appalling. This has to be one of the most awful sits I’ve read about here. The owner was extremely lucky to have you stick out the sit, I don’t know how you did but you dealt with everything very sensibly. I’m pretty certain I couldn’t have stayed the course.

BTW, had this owner had previous sitters? If so, what were the reviews like? Sorry if I’ve missed that.

As others have said, thank goodness you had two nice people to help you out.

You’ve done the right thing by reporting this owner who will hopefully be thrown off the platform immediately. You will also no doubt write an excellent, honest review to warn other prospective sitters should THS keep the owner on the site.

Please share your review here when you’ve written it, or what you plan to write so others can give feedback.

Hopefully your next sit will be completely the opposite to this one.

I am also curious about if they had reviews, how many and what did they say? Also if you had a video chat with this host and what did the photos of their listing look like and were they complete or were photos missing?

I get SO tired of minimal photos on listings showing barely enough to get a sense of the living conditions of the home but a dozen photos of the pets.

Clearly this pet owner should be removed from the platform.

Sounds like an episode of HOARDERS.

Contact HBO.

There was one previous sitter, but she completed her sit just before mine, after I had already accepted my dates. Therefore, I wasn’t able to evaluate her review of the sit before committing. However, I can tell you that she left no review, and she was the homeowner’s very first sitter. I left a one star set review and gave a very complete review of what happened.

There was one previous sitter, but she completed her sit just before mine, after I had already accepted my dates. Therefore, I wasn’t able to evaluate her review of the sit before committing. However, I can tell you that she left no review, and she was the homeowner’s very first sitter.

Homeowner said dog was 17 in listing. Found out it is over 20 and probably 22 from a family member. No video of home but it would not have revealed the problems anyway.

One sitter right before my arrival who left no review.

The homeowner has left me a retaliatory review on TrustedHousesitters. The review contains a number of false statements and inaccuracies. This is for the house sit, where I raised over 20 issues from mold to mice to no working smoke detectors etc.

Ugh.

At least the homeowner is consistent. The retaliatory review containing false statements and inaccuracies follows the path of the initlal listing it seems.